Which platform is more worth holding, OKB, BNB, or HT, for the Three Kingdoms Championship?

The annual and quarterly reports of major virtual currency exchanges around the world have been released, and their revenue capabilities are all very impressive. As a retail investor, can you take advantage of the platform's rapid development and profit? Just hold platform currency! Each major platform has launched their own platform tokens, who is the most generous? Who should we choose?

With the emergence of OKB global universal points, all three major digital asset exchanges in China have completed the issuance of universal points. Coin An first issued BNB, followed by Fire Coin issued HT, and OK finally issued OKB. Many friends are concerned about whether platform coins are worth holding and what is their value? Today, taking advantage of the trend of releasing OKB application scenario planning maps through OK, we will sort out the advantages and disadvantages of the three major platform currencies for everyone. After all, the value of the currency is not worth money, and there is a direct correlation between its potential for appreciation and the corresponding landing applications. It's like whether stocks are worth money or not, which is directly related to the business development of corresponding listed companies.

(Official OKB Global Common Points Ecological Roadmap)

From the ecological construction roadmap and detailed explanation of OKB, there are 7 preliminary OKB application plans. Compared with the ecological construction projects of BNB and HT, I have found many similar construction routes. This reminds me of an advertisement saying, "Someone imitates my face, and someone imitates my face." It's better to imitate or use for reference. After all, this is not a patent infringement, and it has nothing to do with our retail investors, and there is no need to care too much. What everyone is more concerned about is whether there can be differences in details behind similarities, or even surpassing them, bringing more and greater benefits to non holders? Therefore, let's first compare the distribution rules of various welfare items, who is more generous?

1、 Comparison of Three Platform Coins

• OKB's Benefits:Hold OKB and pay weekly dividends. Distribute 50% of OKEX's weekly revenue as a super incentive to OKB holders.

• Benefits of BNB:Every quarter, 20% of the net profit of the Coin Security platform for the current quarter is used to repurchase BNB, and the repurchased BNB is directly destroyed.

• HT's Benefits:Every quarter, 20% of the revenue from Huo Coin's global professional website is used for repurchases, and all HT repurchased is allocated to Huo Coin Investor Protection Fund to compensate Huo Coin users in case of sudden risks on the platform.

2、 Return period

Firstly, we compare the investment return cycle. Obviously, OKB has an advantage in this regard.OKB's benefits are distributed once a week, while BNB and HT's benefits are distributed once a quarter.Simply put, when BNB and HT distribute benefits once, OK has already distributed benefits 12 times (roughly estimated to have 4 weeks in January). If we simply look at the investment return cycle, holding OKB can provide short-term and high-frequency returns. Of course, investment returns ultimately need to be brought to the same level for comparison, such as annualized investment returns. We will compare each point in detail.

3、 Welfare distribution mechanism

We can see that BNB is used for repurchase at 20% of the net profit of the Coin Security platform and will be destroyed. HT is also a 20% proportion, but it is worth noting that,20% of HT only comes from the revenue of HuoCoin Global Professional Station (HuoCoin PRO)This does not include the revenue from HADAX, a subsidiary of HuoCoin. But we are all aware that purchasing HT is for voting on Shangcoin, and ultimately it is listed for trading on HADAX. It seems that they are all allocated at a 20% ratio, but there are substantial differences. Therefore, based on the current situation, BNB's welfare base appears to be larger.

Another point is that BNB and HT are very different,BNB repurchase will be destroyed; HT repurchase without destructionAs risk compensation. Compared to BNB's buyback and destruction, the provision of so many risk reserves for Huo Coin is more friendly to platform coin holders. The essence of repurchasing platform coins with future profits is for the platform to obtain future revenue in advance by issuing coins. This is like a company issuing bonds with cash flow as collateral, and later repurchasing bonds for profit. After the repurchase, it should be destroyed. I think the approach of this coin security is wise.

Next, BNBVSOKB. According to last week's official announcement,OKB distributes dividends based on 50% of revenue, without repurchase or destruction.At first glance, 50% vs. 20%, OKB wins completely, and OKEX is too generous! But here we need to calculate a detailed account for you. We all know that the total amount of OKB is 1 billion, but in fact, this 50% of revenue is allocated based on 1 billion OKB. According to the distribution plan previously released by OKB, 60% of OKB is delivered to OKEX users for free. That is to say, the final circulation to users in the market is 600 million pieces. After simple multiplication and division calculation, the actual revenue proportion that users can receive is 30% (50% * 60%). Fortunately, I went to elementary school and didn't have any knowledge in multiplication and division, so I was almost fooled! From this, it can be seen how important education is, knowledge is money. 30% vs 20%, without considering platform revenue differences, OKB coin holders can receive a higher allocation ratio from the platform.

After reading my comparison of repurchases between BNB and HT, I believe you will conclude that OKB has suffered a disastrous defeat in this round. Because OKB neither repurchases nor destroys. The urban routine is deep, and I want to go back to the countryside. "OKB's practice of not buying back or destroying has instead become a reason for my long-term optimism.

The repurchase of BNB and HT is more like cashing in the platform's value in advance through the market. butOKB is an ecological model that shares platform value with OKB holders. The value of OKB directly reflects investors' expectations for the future profitability of OKEX in the market.The repo is actually opaque. Judging from the recent repo of platform currency, the price of the secondary market has not changed at all, and it has declined; Dividend sharing is more of a choice from the perspective of building a healthy and open ecosystem by binding with platform users.

If BNB and HT are like bonds issued by a company with cash flow as collateral, and then repurchased for profit later on. That OKB is like a stock issued by a company, with holders receiving profit dividends in each fiscal year. Of course, OKB is not a stock, it has a fundamental difference. Investors holding OKB do not have the right to participate in voting on OKEX's operational decisions.

From the perspective of user welfare, who has more investment value, BNB, HT, or OKB? The above analysis is purely personal and does not take into account the specific transaction volume and profitability of each platform. The content is only for reference and learning.